The Supreme Court directed the Centre to examine whether the rules framed by various states under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) are in conformity with the central legislation and subserve the interest of homebuyers.

RERA implementation to improve post SC direction on examining states’ rules: FPCE

Homebuyers’ apex body FPCE expects the implementation of realty law RERA to improve following the Supreme Court’s recent direction to the Centre to examine the rules framed by states and see whether those subserve the consumers’ interest.

Last month, the Supreme Court directed the Centre to examine whether the rules framed by various states under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) are in conformity with the central legislation and subserve the interest of homebuyers.

A bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud and Surya Kant gave three months to the Centre to examine if there are any deviations between the rules drawn up by the states and those framed by the Centre in 2016, and to place the report by the first week of May 2022.

When contacted, Forum for People’s Collective Efforts’ (FPCE) President Abhay Kumar Upadhyay said: “Despite five years of its full implementation, RERA is yet to reach anywhere near its intended objective.”

The prime reason for this is that the states to whom responsibility has been given for its implementation did not follow any uniformity in their general real estate rules and rules for agreement for sale, he pointed out.

“Their (states’) rules were not within the four corners of the provisions of RERA. This took sting out of the Act and homebuyers were deprived of the benefits of RERA,” Upadhyay said.

On the other hand, the association’s president said, builders took full advantage of this and the fear of RERA catching them faded.

“In view of this, though late, but still this ruling from the Supreme Court will set things right going forward and many homebuyers will then reap the benefit,” he added.

Most importantly, this ruling would break the belief in most builders that they are above the law or that they can take the law for granted, he said.

“I sincerely hope that both the ministry to whom the task has been assigned directly and also the Amicus who has also been given responsibility will devote sufficient time and report not only all deviations but also missing content which may have left loopholes in the implementation of RERA,” Upadhyay said.

This order has once again raised the hopes of homebuyers that they will get justice sooner than later, he added.

Colliers India CEO Ramesh Nair said the Supreme Court’s decree to scrutinise RERA rules of states is significant as there is a lack of uniformity in builder-buyer agreements across RERA rules of various states.

“This directive will help bring accountability and transparency in dealings between homebuyers and developers in several cases,” he said.

The anomalies mainly existed with respect to the payment schedule, delivery schedule and associated delays, as well as liability towards structural defects, Nair pointed out.

“A uniform builder-buyer agreement will also lead to more confidence amongst homebuyers. It will instill trust in homebuyers, without the fear of any unwarranted liabilities,” Nair said.

Homebuyers would also have more faith in developers across the spectrum, and even in under-construction projects, the Colliers India CEO said.

Source: https://realty.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/industry/rera-implementation-to-improve-post-sc-direction-on-examining-states-rules-fpce/90181477

At least four real estate projects are getting registered every day in the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) this year in the state.

Madhya Pradesh: Four real estate projects are registered with RERA daily

At least four real estate projects are getting registered every day in the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) this year in the state. If the number of registration of projects is anything to go by to understand the real estate scenario in Madhya Pradesh, the projects registered in the past three months this year in MP, is more than the total number of projects registered in the year 2020-2021.

RERA officials said, along with big cities, applications are being received for project registration from small towns like Dindori, Jhabua, Katni, Alirajpur, Rajgarh, Betul and Shajapur. As a result of this, there has been an expected increase in the project registration work of RERA this year as compared to last year.

The number of registered projects in the year 2020-2021 was 232 while 352 projects have been registered so far this year. This is 50% more than the previous year. Due to the second and third wave of corona in the financial year 2021-2022, the office work has also been adversely affected.

RERA Secretary Neeraj Dubey has informed that about 1,706 registrations were done after a brief examination in the already ongoing projects at the time RERA Act came into force.

Around 1,116 and a total of 2,822 projects have been registered in the subsequent four years. The average of new project registrations for four years is about 279, while in the fifth year alone the number of registrations has increased to 352. To ensure compliance of the provisions of the Act, the authority has issued notices to the colonizer in about 42 cases and also imposed fines. It may be mentioned that such action has been taken for non-compliance of the orders passed in favor of the allottees. The registration of a project has also been cancelled, officials added.

Source: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bhopal/four-real-estate-projects-are-registered-with-rera-daily/articleshow/89979842.cms

Do check the (KRERA) authority’s website to see whether the developer has updated all relevant details of the project on the authority’s website.

Homebuyers can verify project details on Rera website

Homebuyers beware! You just cannot sit back and relax if a builder claims that his project is registered with the Kerala Real Estate Regulatory Authority (K-Rera). Do check the authority’s website to see whether the developer has updated all relevant details of the project on the authority’s website — www.rera.kerala.gov.in

Recently, the authority had sent show-cause notices to promoters, including builders and developers, who obtained registration for their projects but failed to upload the required details on the website. As per the rule, promoters have to upload project details including necessary licences and sanctions, on the website. Also, the promoter has to update the progress of work in every quarter of the year until the last unit is handed over.

The authority has now warned the public to exercise caution while dealing with 29 builders, including some big names, who have failed to upload details. The list is available on its website.The authority will be forced to take strict action if the promoters fail to comply with the rule, said K-Rera chairman P H Kurian.

“The project details, including mandatory sanctions and stage of work, uploaded on the website help the authority monitor its progress. Even more important is that the information, updated in every quarter, helps customers to review the progress. All these details are freely available on the website,” he told TNIE.

Projects adhering to K-Rera’s norms are a safe bet for customers. While registering a project with K-Rera, the promoter has to upload all details of the project on w ww.rera.kerala.gov.in They include audited balance sheet of the promoter, track record, records of land ownership, sanctioned plans and NOCs from the authorities concerned. This facility will allow customers to make informed choices. The quarterly updates by the promoters help customers in continuous monitoring.

K-RERA registration is mandatory for real estate projects which fit into the definition stated in the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016. It should be a real estate development with a land area of more than 500 sq m; plot development projects which require development permit/layout approval under Kerala Panchayat Building Rules, 2019/ Kerala Municipality Building Rules, 2019; development of more than 8 numbers of flats, shops, office space, godowns etc which are intended to be transferred to another person(s) on leasehold or freehold basis. Projects which received occupancy certificates before May 1, 2017, will not come under the jurisdiction of the authority.

Source: https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2022/feb/27/homebuyers-can-verify-project-details-on-rera-website-2424208.html

Telangana Chief Secretary Somesh Kumar held a meeting with representatives of CREDAI, TREDAI, Telangana Builders Association and other organisations on issues related to development of real estate and pre-launch of cases without RERA regulation.

Telangana chief secretary warns realty sector over RERA violations

Telangana Chief Secretary Somesh Kumar held a meeting with representatives of CREDAI, TREDAI, Telangana Builders Association and other organisations on issues related to development of real estate and pre-launch of cases without RERA regulation.

He warned of strict action, including filing of criminal cases as per the provisions of RERA, against people, companies and developers, who are found involved in undivided sales and pre-launch sales. It was also decided to constitute a team for tracking social media.

A special campaign will be taken up by CREDAI, in coordination with the municipal, registration and IPR departments, to create awareness among people to buy only those projects which are approved by RERA and not get cheated by builders, who are involved in fraudulent activities.

Representatives of various real estate bodies urged the government to take strict action against fraudulent builders. It was also decided to form an expert committee comprising officials from town planning and registration departments and representatives of CREDAI to suggest measures to curb the menace of undivided sales and pre-launch sales.

No place to hide for violators: Somesh

Somesh Kumar said strict action, including filing of criminal cases, would be taken as per RERA against people, companies and developers, found involved in undivided sales and pre-launch sales. A team would also social media for violations, he said.

Source: https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/telangana/2022/feb/19/telangana-chief-secretary-warns-realty-sector-over-rera-violations-2421205.html

In case of delayed possession of house in Navi Mumbai, the MahaRERA Appellate Tribunal (Mumbai) upheld the MahaRERA order of payment of interest on the amount paid by the aggrieved homebuyer.

Navi Mumbai: Over delay, homebuyer gets interest on total cost

In the case of delayed possession of a house in Navi Mumbai, the MahaRERA Appellate Tribunal (Mumbai) upheld the MahaRERA order of payment of interest on the amount paid by the aggrieved homebuyer.

The order states,the builder is now required to pay a marginal cost of lending rate (MCLR) and two per cent interest under section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act. The disputed property – on the 17th floor of Marathon NexE one of Sanvo Resorts Pvt Ltd– was bought by Neha Bagwe for Rs 38.77 lakh, excluding taxes and other charges, in 2012.

The agreement was signed in 2014 after the developer accepted Rs 10 lakh. The developer had promised possession in 2016, and Bagwe paid the entire amount by then. However, she and her family got possession only in January this year. Bagwe said she moved MahaRERA in 2018, seeking interest from the builder on the flat cost.

In 2019, the MahaRERA passed an order in her favour. However, the developer appealed in the Appellate Tribunal seeking that Bagwe’s plea be dismissed on grounds that the delay was caused due to factors beyond his control. Bagwe said the delay was stressful for the family as she had a home loan monthly instalment of Rs 20,000.

She said she had also taken an education loan for her daughter. The builder had contended in the Tribunal that the project land was declared as notified area in January 2013 by the state government.

Source: https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/navi-mumbai-over-delay-homebuyer-gets-interest-on-total-cost

Sending out a strong message to the developers who are yet to comply with its earlier orders, the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UP-Rera) has imposed a penalty of Rs 1.08 crore on seven developers.

Rera fines 7 developers over ₹1 crore for not handing over flats within deadline

Sending out a strong message to the developers who are yet to comply with its earlier orders, the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UP-Rera) has imposed a penalty of Rs 1.08 crore on seven developers.

All the seven builders have failed to deliver the units to their buyers within the stipulated deadlines. While four have projects in Noida, two are from Ghaziabad and one is based in Meerut.

TOI has learnt that UP-Rera chairman, along with the secretary and its three members, held a meeting on January 24 to review the status of its orders. At the meeting, they noticed that some developers, despite seeking additional time from the regulator to fulfil the obligations, failed to comply with the directions.

The buyers, meanwhile, kept filing their appeals before the Authority to get the due payment and allotment.

Invoking the Rera Act, the regulator slapped the highest penalty of Rs 35.41 lakh on Gardenia India Limited.

During an inspection in October last year at Rera’s behest, a team of experts visited the Gardenia Gateway project in Sector 75 that was to be completed in two phases. However, several anomalies were detected during the survey of the project and many amenities promised to the buyers remained incomplete.

Similarly from Ghaziabad, Sarvottam Realcon Pvt Ltd was asked to pay up Rs 27.08 lakh while Ansal Urban Condominiums has to deposit Rs 3.09 lakh.

Alpha Corp Development Pvt Ltd, which is developing a project on the Meerut-Muzaffarnagar highway has been asked to pay Rs 8.75 lakh.

In case the developers fail to deposit the penalty amount within 15 days, officials said, the regulator could issue recovery certificates against them and ask the local administration to attach their properties to recover the money.

In another development, the regulator has extended the deadline for developers to file the quarterly progress report of their projects by two months.

“They will now get time till February 28 to upload details on our portals,” said a Rera official.

Source: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/noida/rera-fines-7-developers-over-1-crore-for-not-handing-over-flats-within-deadline/articleshow/89167236.cms

To protect the interests of consumers, the State Government formed the Real Estate Regulatory Authority under the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act, 2016.

Real Estate Business: RERA fails to protect consumers’ interests

To protect the interests of consumers, the State Government formed the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Five years have elapsed, but RERA failed to serve its very purpose.

The outcome is that the Gauhati High Court has served a notice to RERA a few days back based on a PIL filed by Anita Verma. The PIL will come up for its next hearing on February 3, 2022.

The State government set up the RERA to protect apartment buyers from harassment from builders and promoters. The key objective of RERA is to upload details of promoters and developers antecedents, the status of approval of buildings and other related information on the website.

The Act says that RERA has to launch its website within a year and upload details of promoters and developers. It will let the buyers know the details of building promoters before making any advance payment for buying apartments. Five years have already elapsed, but RERA has not yet launched its website.

The Act has provisions of the appellate authority and a court to settle disputes between buyers and sellers. However, the court is not functioning smoothly. The Act further says that all activities of RERA will be online. However, RERA does most of its work manually.

Apartments keep springing up in Guwahati and other urban areas in the state. A section of builders takes advance amounts from buyers. However, they (builders) often fail to hand over apartments to the buyers on time. In most cases, the buyers have to run after builders.

Some builders also play the mischief – they show buildings’ interior plans while signing agreements but make changes at their convenience later, deviating from the original plans. Had RERA launched its website on time, the customers would have got details of building projects before making advance payments or signing agreements.

A source associated with the real estate business said, “It baffles us why RERA has not launched the website even after five years of its formation. Thus it has failed the very objective of the Act. RERA makes queries to promoters regarding the technical and legal aspects of projects. Agencies like the GMC, GMDA, Town and Country Planning bodies permit us to erect buildings after verifying all related issues. Why should RERA quiz us regarding projects? It is high time RERA focused on its objectives to protect buyers’ interests.”

Source: https://www.sentinelassam.com/topheadlines/real-estate-business-rera-fails-to-protect-consumers-interests-575775

With the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority linking a memorandum of understanding(MoU) with the technology firm Jupitice Justice technologies for digitalization of complaint redress system.

Soon, Rera to kick off digital court for redress of disputes

With the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (H-Rera) inking a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with technology firm Jupitice Justice Technologies on Thursday for digitalization of complaint redress system, aggrieved homebuyers can hope for a quicker resolution of disputes with developers.

The Chandigarh-based company, officials said, will design and develop a digital Rera court to enable all its stakeholders to execute and perform end-to-end Dispute Resolution Mechanism (DRM) online from the comfort of their home or office. KK Khandelwal, the chairman of H-Rera, Gurgaon, said the company will offer technical expertise to the authority to facilitate dispute resolution and delivery of justice in a simpler, quicker, safer and transparent manner under the pilot project.

“The authority will use the digital court to conduct end-to-end proceedings for easy and effective dispute resolution for the disputants and other stakeholders involved in the process,” Khandelwal said, adding that the user will be provided with end-to-end abilities to plead and conduct all proceedings under the quasi-judicial mechanism, from filing disputes to decision making, all the platform.

Another H-Rera official said the pandemic has speeded the adoption of digital technologies in the past couple of years. “Now, the consumers need not visit the Rera office for their case proceedings,” Khandelwal added.

Raman Aggarwal, the founder and CEO of Jupitice Justice Technologies, said with this partnership, the authority can support large, scalable and evolving needs of the complainants/disputants in the real estate industry for enhanced access, quick and inexpensive settlement of commercial disputes by leveraging new age technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and Blockchain. The digital Rera court, Aggarwal said, will also support AI-enabled self-representation, while all the useful documents related to respective cases will be secured through the Blockchain-enabled digital locker.

Source: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/gurgaon/soon-rera-to-kick-off-digital-court-for-redress-of-disputes/articleshow/89027375.cms

The forum consists of representatives from CREDAI-Pune Metro, Mumbai Grahak Panchayat, a leading consumer body and other promoters' associations.

MahaRERA’s conciliation forum settles 351 disputes between homebuyers, developers

The Conciliation Forum formed under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) and Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) to facilitate disputes between homebuyers and developers amicably to save cost and time of litigation has been proving beneficial as around 351 cases have been settled in Pune so far.

As a part of the regulatory body, the Conciliation Forum was formed in March 2018 to enable the disputed parties to connect and also appear before the expert conciliators to resolve their problems, clear doubts and mitigate misunderstandings.

The forum consists of representatives from CREDAI-Pune Metro, Mumbai Grahak Panchayat, a leading consumer body and other promoters’ associations.

Since its inception in 2018, the forum claimed that it has studied many matters of disputes and successfully resolved cases of aggrieved allottees or the promoters, who have opted for the conciliation mechanism, set up under MahaRERA.

The senior conciliators of the forum from CREDAI-Pune Metro include Hemant Naiknavare, former president, Amar Manjrekar, vice-president, Aditya Javdekar, vice-president, Arvind Jain, secretary, I P Inamdar, treasurer, Kishore Pate, former vice-president and Hemendra Shah, former managing committee member.

As per the forum’s process, any aggrieved party, customer or developer, can make a complaint online from the MahaRERA website after which a conciliation request is sent automatically to the other party involved. Once the other party accepts the request within seven days, the aggrieved party has to pay a requisite fee to MahaRERA, after which the case is referred to the appropriate conciliation bench, where the disputed parties seek to reach an amicable settlement with the assistance of the conciliator, who acts as a neutral third party, a member said.

“Conciliation Forum is a platform where the disputed parties get an opportunity to connect and also before the expert conciliators resolve disputes amicably. The parties get a chance to express their sides freely in front of the conciliation bench with a face to face interaction. A conciliator bench proposes the best possible process to deal with the dispute by making recommendations in the form of advice and suggestion and once the dispute is resolved, the conciliator issues a ‘settlement agreement’ which records the outcome of the dispute,” said CREDAI-Pune Metro President, Anil Pharande.

In certain cases which may include stalled, litigated or mortgaged projects, where the interest of a large number of allottees is affected, the forum, by putting extra time and efforts, has invited all the concerning parties such as financial institutes, land owners or any third party to attend the proceedings to resolve the issue amicably, he said.

In 2020, the forum took up the most complicated case of a stalled project in Pune wherein a huge relief was provided to 520 allottees after the settlement.

Similarly, the forum has taken up cases, including disagreements due to delay in possession or a claim where one flat was sold to multiple buyers, resulting in court litigation. The conciliators have handled the cases of defence and police department personnel as well, Pharande said.

Source: https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/pune/mahareras-conciliation-forum-settles-351-disputes-between-homebuyers-developers-7717446/

The Supreme Court has directed developers to deposit either full compensation and interest imposed by the regulatory body or at least 30 per cent of the penalty as a pre-condition to challenging any RERA order.

Supreme Court ruling binding builders to pay before challenging RERA order a welcome move

Developers now may have to think twice before challenging Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) orders as the Supreme Court has directed that developers should either deposit full compensation and interest imposed by the regulatory body or at least 30 per cent of the penalty before they can challenge the order before the appellate authority. Professionals practising in MahaRERA welcomed the SC decision and said the order has hit the nail on the head by ensuring that flat owners get justice and do not fall prey to the delaying tactics often adopted by the builders by challenging such orders.

CA Ramesh Prabhu, founder chairman of MahaSEWA (Maharashtra Societies Welfare Association), said, “This is a landmark and welcome decision passed by the Supreme Court. Now the promoters will think many times before the appeal is filed. Now they may decide to file the appeal if they are sure of winning. Appeals by promoters will come down drastically. The judgement has put all the doubts to rest. Even the appellate tribunal will not be able to proceed to admit the appeals of the promoter unless 100 per cent of the amount is deposited.”

“However, if the allottees are aggrieved against the order of authority or adjudication officer, the appeal may be filed without depositing any amount. This also becomes a great deterrent to the promoters to file the appeal. Therefore, now we find most of the promoters try to settle the dispute out of court as soon as complaints are filed,” Prabhu said.

Solicitor Stuti Galiya said, “It is a well known fact that builder lobbies have abundant legal and financial resources and they often create separate legal budgets for each project. Hence, it is seen that most of the time, developers/builders do not take the legal action against them seriously, as they believe that they could easily get through by stretching the matter in various forums for years and years. This often results in justice being denied to flat owners as they often are not able to fight such a long legal battle, for financial and time constraints. This judgement has hit the nail on the head by ensuring that flat owners get justice and do not fall prey to the delaying tactics. This is certainly a positive and welcome move in the right direction.”

Advocate Godfrey Pimenta, who practises in MahaRERA, said, “The Supreme Court judgement only endorses section 40(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 that the amount invested by the allottees, which is often their life savings, along with the interest thereon as quantified by the regulatory authority or the adjudicating officer, can be recovered as arrears of land revenue by them from the builders. However, the practical difficulty faced by the flat buyers is the laborious process in attaching the properties of the developer.”

Advocate Vinod Sampat, founder president of Flat Users Residents Welfare Association, said, “The said judgement is a big boost to flat purchasers. Builders who delay construction or the project for one reason or other will have to refund the principal amount and interest to defaulted flat buyers. It is common knowledge that delaying tactics are adopted by both builders and as well as their advocates. The approach of the court to insist on the deposit before accepting an appeal is a welcome move.”

The case

Newtech Promoters and Developers Private Limited v State of Uttar Pradesh and others is a case where the flat buyer filed a complaint against the developer for non-compliance of possession of flat within the stipulated time period, as per the agreement. The complainant had booked a flat by paying a consideration of Rs 28.21 lakh on October 4, 2012, and the possession, as per the agreement, was to be given by 2015. However, when the developer failed, the buyer moved the complaint demanding refund of Rs 28.21 lakh with interest.

The state RERA authority found the complainant’s claims to be true and accordingly on April 5, 2019 passed an order directing the developer to refund the principal amount of Rs 28.21 lakh along with interest of Rs 19.82 lakh. The developer, instead of executing the RERA order, moved a writ petition challenging the same including the recovery certificate dated September 8, 2020 holding it to be without jurisdiction as it has been passed by a single member of RERA. The developer claimed the single member had no jurisdiction to pass such an order. However, the SC set aside the developer’s plea and passed the landmark verdict.

Source: https://www.mid-day.com/mumbai/mumbai-news/article/supreme-court-ruling-binding-builders-to-pay-before-challenging-rera-order-a-welcome-move-23208089